Friday, December 14, 2012

Off Topic


I am going off-topic again this week. I just want to bring up something that most of you might agree on.
Mostly everything we believe in is based on our perception. The perfect example of this is the “villain” in a movie or a show.
The reason “villain” is in quotations because how do we really know that this person is evil? How do we know that he or she is doing these despicable actions to save their families? It’s because the movie/show makes you perceive this person as evil. Certain movies/shows don’t go in depth into this “villain’s” life and show why or how they became like that. They allow no sympathy for them.
One example is a show from my childhood, Kim Possible. Kim Possible is about a teen heroine who saves the world daily. Her main foes are Dr. Drakken and Shego. Dr. Drakken is pretty much harmless because without his muscle, Shego, he is just a madman. In one of the movies that spun off the show, So the Drama, Kim Possible ends up kicking Shego into the electrical tower. Shego is electrocuted, but since she has superpowers, she is fine and is arrested with really frizzy hair. Had Shego been a normal person, she would have died. Kim Possible wouldn't have been blamed because it would be viewed as "justice" even though a life is lost. What if Shego killed Kim Possible to protect herself? Would it be still viewed as justice?
Another example is in the show The Powerpuff Girls. The Powerpuff Girls is about three young girls, five- or six-year-olds who are artificially created by Professor Utonium, using sugar, spice, and everything nice. He accidentally spills Chemical X into the concoction,  and pow! the Powerpuff girls pop out. They, too, save the day on a daily basis. They practically beat villains to unconsciousness, and I remember cheering and smiling when that happened. When the villains were winning I was upset because I thought "how could anyone treat three young girls like that?" Now that I'm older I understand how biased these plots were. How do I know that the villains aren't just teaching them a lesson, and that they were really protecting the girls from a more sadistic villain. It was because the show wasn't set up like that; it was set up for children to cheer on the girls because they were shown as "good" and to berate the villains because they were "bad".
Have these kinds of movies and shows really taught us  black-and-white thinking? We were taught to quickly judge people because we perceived their actions as bad without knowing the reason behind it.  But as time goes on, we realize that there are no clear, distinct ways to distinguish good from bad. We know it's wrong to kill people, but what if it was to save a loved one? We know it's wrong to steal, but what if a loved one wished for something on their deathbed and you didn't have any money to buy it?
Is it because people believe children are too young to learn about the gray areas of life? I believe by not teaching children about this gray area, children learn to judge people too quickly because other people don't share the same views. Disagree or agree? Write your opinions below and feel free to discuss.

Friday, December 7, 2012

Bullying, Peer Pressure, and Judgment: Where Do You FIt In?

Check out this blog if you ever need advice
Bullying, Peer Pressure, and Judgment: Where Do You FIt In?: Hey guys, and welcome to my ninth entry. In this entry I will be talking about fitting in. I’m pretty sure that most of you, if not all, hav...

Thursday, December 6, 2012

Fangirls Today


Everyone knows this type of fangirl. She spams your newsfeed on Twitter or Facebook and litter your Instagram feed with pictures of a certain five boys. That’s right, I’m talking about Directioners_ crazy, starstruck, obsessed 12- to 17 year old girls.
These girls are psychotic; talk badly about their precious One Direction and you’re immediately bombarded with “OMG what’s wrong with you? One Direction is amazing!” or “OMG you just don’t know good music!!”.
I know, you are probably thinking, “You titled this ‘Fangirls Today’... what’s your point?” The point I’m trying to make is I don’t believe the girls who fawned over The Beatles or ABBA were so “vicious” about loving them; I doubt those ABBA or Beatles fans would have attacked you if you spoke badly about these groups, or at least I hope they didn’t.
I believe that fangirls in the past were more tame in their fangirl passions. If you didn’t like their group, it was more of a “your loss” kind of attitude. These girls would shrug the bad remarks off and keep praising the objects of their affection. They really didn’t care what other people thought; as long as their favorite band was playing, they were happy.
In contrast, fangirls today _ the worst culprits being Directioners, as they refer to themselves _ have this “love [insert band/artist name here] or die” type of attitude. I have seen this type of attitude up close. I was on Instagram, and I clicked on the ‘popular page’ tab. I saw yet another picture of one of the boys_ not sure which, I still don’t know each of their names_ with at least 1,000 likes. One user stated that he/she thought the boy was ugly. For the next 30 minutes, the girl was bombarded with hate messages_ I know it was for her because they tagged her in the comments_ saying she’s stupid or she’s probably ugly and jealous, etc., etc.
To wrap it up, I believe today’s fangirls today- all the Beliebers, the Mahonies , as well as the Directioners_ should just tone it down. I’m not saying to stop praising them altogether, but to respect others’ opinions about your favorite band or singer. Everyone will either agree or disagree with you; it’s only fair to respect both sides.
Like I said, the comment box is open. Feel free to discuss and argue, and I will post a new entry next Friday.

Saturday, December 1, 2012

Obsessed With Technology

Hi everyone! I hope you guys have had a great holiday weekend. I am back with more entries.
Back when technology first came out, people were interested but not as “obsessed” as people are today.
Back then, people didn't really have technology to be obsessed with. They had to do with what they had to get by and made the best out of it.
Nowadays, people are all up in their technology. Many web article authors agree and feel like it’ll only get worse as time goes on. (I will post the link of one of the articles below. Feel free to read it and comment.)
Not only are psychology experts and journalists noticing this change, but regular people too. I asked my mother, who’s 52, if she thinks people are more obsessed with technology now compared to back then. She hastily replied, “Well of course.! Back then, we didn't have that much technology; you make do with what you have. Now— you see them on the train: they’re playing; they’re texting; they’re reading; they’re typing. Definitely [obsessed]!”
Do you agree with what’s happening? Do you think it will change our social interactions with each other from this period on? Feel free to post your opinions below, and check out the article below.
http://www.davidwygant.com/blog/are-we-too-obsessed-with-technology/7212/